https://wiki.curatecamp.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=Meg+Phillips&feedformat=atomCURATEcamp - User contributions [en]2024-03-28T10:11:59ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.28.0https://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/collaboration&diff=2609IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 2013/collaboration2013-04-04T14:21:32Z<p>Meg Phillips: </p>
<hr />
<div>== Session 1 : Crowdsourcing and Collaboration ==<br />
<br />
<br />
COOPERATIVE PRESERVATION<br />
<br />
imls grant - underfunded orgs, preservation planning<br />
<br />
-can't create all the tools or interfaces we need, need to work with users or others<br />
<br />
-API - stanford api for retrieving content, open annotation <br />
<br />
-shared canvas--lanl data model<br />
<br />
-work with a structure<br />
<br />
-hydra-fedora, solr, web applications (heads) <br />
<br />
-avalon media system (hydra)<br />
<br />
-passive sharing in system<br />
<br />
-accept chaanges from other machines <br />
<br />
-clockss<br />
<br />
-DPN-instuitutions can be members <br />
<br />
bittorrant type system for data uplink and redundancy<br />
<br />
-smaller communities, active fork of the data for discovery<br />
<br />
-rep of things that culd be shared, share the work of creating metadata, shared software, shared infrastructure<br />
<br />
if i'm a one person, where do i get the right leverage?<br />
<br />
-NDSA is where i hear about things, can propose a project<br />
<br />
-hook in enthusiest person to work that needs to be done<br />
<br />
-tool registry - coptr - fits -caltur? A/V <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
CROWDSOURCING<br />
<br />
Samuel study on crowdsourcing<br />
<br />
can't do it alone<br />
<br />
-augment data, distribute preservation infrastructure<br />
<br />
-provide apis and persistant id<br />
<br />
-authenticity issues, good and bad, good for an access structure. not all info provided is good<br />
<br />
-galaxy zoo<br />
<br />
-wgbh, id video clips<br />
<br />
-up vote like stack overflow<br />
<br />
-transparent process + social media up voting<br />
<br />
-why not share data? <br />
<br />
-why not disstributed storage?<br />
<br />
-Denmark farm photo project, 50,000 points, retirees writing stories, tv and media attention<br />
<br />
Report on crowdsourcing projects for web archives from the IIPC: http://netpreserve.org/resources/crowdsourcing-web-archiving<br />
<br />
Gallaxy Zoo project: WWW.gallaxyzoo.org<br />
<br />
Recent blog post on crowd sourcing project, Metadata Games: http://blogs.loc.gov/digitalpreservation/2013/04/the-metadata-games-crowdsourcing-toolset-for-libraries-archives-an-interview-with-mary-flanagan/<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
PRODUCT or thing<br />
<br />
leverage resources to help us get work done<br />
<br />
people + tools<br />
<br />
successful examples of what could be shared<br />
<br />
a registry of different different levels of collaboration/tool sharing<br />
<br />
where can we make the biggesat difference?<br />
<br />
where are the spunky nerds (out of work)<br />
<br />
Upcoming a/v curate camp, google hangout to kick up some tangilble goals<br />
<br />
-shared curation infrastucture, don't know where the money would come from<br />
<br />
-people feel intimidated, train the trainer needed<br />
<br />
-NDSA staffing survey, what do you outsource, what don't you? policy - no, standaards can help with the rest<br />
<br />
turnkey is expensive, can get trapped, <br />
<br />
Need a community collabrative space<br />
<br />
a consumer reports - contribute info to make quality better across the board<br />
<br />
use basecamp to share procedures in CO<br />
<br />
easy to find what you need, smaller group<br />
<br />
neutral language<br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
•BitTorrent for replication <br />
<br />
•Many different things that could be shared (work, SW, discovery, access, infrastructure, expertise, development)...<br />
<br />
•Hydra project<br />
<br />
•Tool registry (Illinois, Paul Wheatley/Spruce)<br />
<br />
•MediaInfo - A/V md extraction (Caltura uses it?)<br />
<br />
•Avalon (Ind.) is a Hydra head<br />
<br />
•Denmark - lots of crowd participation (advertised on TV, radio)<br />
<br />
•How to leverage collaboration in a really effective way<br />
<br />
•What you can’t outsource <br />
◦What community am I trying to serve?<br />
◦What does that community need?<br />
<br />
•Lack of collaboration spaces <br />
◦Share procedures, templates, policies<br />
◦Ask questions◦Easy to find what you need when you need it<br />
<br />
•Language is a barrier<br />
<br />
•Within your institution - how your work fits into the larger collaborations <br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
- Would it be possible to come up with an intellectual framework for collaboration so we can talk more clearly about the options and figure out the areas where different institutions can get the biggest multiplier effects from working with others? For example:<br />
<br />
- shared work: outsource some work to others, including crowdsourcing, using other volunteers, etc: help creating metadata, help creating new tools for you specifically using APIs, etc. Sharing particular kinds of digital preservatione expertise could fit here, too - mentoring and consulting with peers at other institutions, for example<br />
- Shared tools - many institutions using the same tools, develop once, use many times across the community<br />
- Shared infrastructure, for example participation in a LOCKSS network for bitstream preservation<br />
- many institutions actually using the same repository/ digital preservation system. It's a fine line between this and participation in a network, but I think there's a distinction. This last option, where the local institution may be using a system that they aren't running, could be helpful for very small institutions with no local DP expertise or a strong IT infrastructure.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/collaboration&diff=2608IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 2013/collaboration2013-04-04T13:32:59Z<p>Meg Phillips: </p>
<hr />
<div><br />
== Session 1 : Crowdsourcing and Collaboration ==<br />
<br />
<br />
•BitTorrent for replication <br />
<br />
•Many different things that could be shared (work, SW, discovery, access, infrastructure, expertise, development)...<br />
<br />
•Hydra project<br />
<br />
•Tool registry (Illinois, Paul Wheatley/Spruce)<br />
<br />
•MediaInfo - A/V md extraction (Caltura uses it?)<br />
<br />
•Avalon (Ind.) is a Hydra head<br />
<br />
•Denmark - lots of crowd participation (advertised on TV, radio)<br />
<br />
•How to leverage collaboration in a really effective way<br />
<br />
•What you can’t outsource <br />
◦What community am I trying to serve?<br />
◦What does that community need?<br />
<br />
•Lack of collaboration spaces <br />
◦Share procedures, templates, policies<br />
◦Ask questions◦Easy to find what you need when you need it<br />
<br />
•Language is a barrier<br />
<br />
•Within your institution - how your work fits into the larger collaborations <br />
<br />
- Would it be possible to come up with an intellectual framework for collaboration so we can talk more clearly about the options and figure out the areas where different institutions can get the biggest multiplier effects from working with others? For example:<br />
<br />
- shared work: outsource some work to others, including crowdsourcing, using other volunteers, etc: help creating metadata, help creating new tools for you specifically using APIs, etc. Sharing particular kinds of digital preservatione expertise could fit here, too - mentoring and consulting with peers at other institutions, for example<br />
- Shared tools - many institutions using the same tools, develop once, use many times across the community<br />
- Shared infrastructure, for example participation in a LOCKSS network for bitstream preservation<br />
- many institutions actually using the same repository/ digital preservation system. It's a fine line between this and participation in a network, but I think there's a distinction. This last option, where the local institution may be using a system that they aren't running, could be helpful for very small institutions with no local DP expertise or a strong IT infrastructure.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013&diff=2607IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 20132013-04-04T13:32:24Z<p>Meg Phillips: </p>
<hr />
<div>== We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. ==<br />
<br />
When? Tuesday, April 2, 2013<br />
<br />
What time? 1:15 – 5:30 pm<br />
<br />
Where? The National Archives, Washington DC ("Archives I")<br />
<br />
<br />
The theme is "'''Digitized / Born Digital Together'''."<br />
<br />
Megan Phillips, Kate Murray, and Mike Horsley, of NARA will be facilitating, but if others experienced with the format would like to help facilitate, too, please get in touch!<br />
<br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
<br />
'''CURATEcamp Set Up'''<br />
<br />
1:15 - Convene in Jefferson Room: Welcome and logistics<br />
<br />
1:25 - Propose and post discussion ideas on the schedule grid [http://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php/IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/schedule]<br />
<br />
1:45 - Consolidate, rearrange, finalize schedule grid [http://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php/IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/schedule]<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Session 1'''<br />
<br />
Adams: Open Access: DRAFT: tsumani is coming (open up media file for public domain use). If that is environment we live in, provide authentic copy/version with metadata<br />
<br />
Jefferson 1: Cooperative digital curation and crowdsourcing: DRAFT: People trying to do more and leverage resources of users and other institutions. Various projects: Galaxy view (sp?). How do people feel about bring crowdsourced data back into institution? Denmark project about farm photots just released. TV ads (?) Retirees writing more information. Collaborative tools. Using shared standards for APIs, Hydra - can share tools ..... Sharing data and distributed infrastructure. Product might be outline or registry of shared tools. "Spunky nerds" - interested technical parties that could help. What is outsourced/in-house? What are pros and cons? [[http://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php/IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/collaboration]]<br />
<br />
Jefferson 2: Rights issues and privacy: DRAFT: concrete issues around publishing digitized material when can't go back to contact copyright holders. Discussion on different laws in different countries: moral, ethical issues around access. Differences in copyright laws and preservation programs in different countries, like Canada's change in surrogates status (?)<br />
<br />
Washington: Curating incoming digital material/accessing born digital material/digitally acquired material: Discussion notes http://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php/IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/curating_digital_material<br />
<br />
Madison - Laser scanning / 3D data: DRAFT: Laser scanning to make models but what happens to data over time? Simulation data of seismic data over time. Massive data sets - 100 GB per object, proprietary software, rapid changes, responsibility. Conclusions: for cultural heritage institutions don't have resources so dependent on science or industry to develop standards. But does it need to be preserved? What to keep? Who can make the decisions?<br />
<br />
'''Break''' <br />
<br />
3:00 - 3:30 - Soft drinks will be available at 3:15<br />
<br />
'''Session 2'''<br />
<br />
Adams: Records management and electronic records preservation: DRAFT: Concept to mesh RM and electronic records preservation. No consensus on answers. Some federal agencies are working on e-discovery including auto-catagorization such as email parsing (needs to be cost effective and meet electronic records preservation standards). Issues: privacy rights and legal issues. Need additional funding. Lifecycle management. Big data research might be relevant. May be an opportunity to include 508 compliance within projects. <br />
<br />
Jefferson 1: DRAFT Formats/normalization: unidentifiable formats. use case - data coming from sensor but can't be identified. Can expose problem files to developers to have them improve tools. Also, knowledge base problem. People can contribute to format registries to improve knowledge but not enough people working on problem. When formats are proprietary and often lack documentation. Normalization - good or bad? Situational. Content might warrant it or email format might be too difficult to deal with so normalize. Raw formats are good to keep but might need to be normalized. Transformation: what is lossless transformation? Discussion notes http://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php/IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/formats<br />
<br />
Jefferson 2: Integrity and authenticity in digitized/born digital material: DRAFT: Authenticity discussion. Why is it hard to deal with? Outcomes: Is there varying degrees of authenticity (like "trusted")? Is it reasonable to think that a copy be authentic across all domains? Maybe the best we can do is document processes/decisions and leave it up to others to judge if copy is authentic for purpose?<br />
<br />
Washington: Role of archives, info and RM managers in cyberwarfare: SESSION DID NOT HAPPEN<br />
<br />
Madison: How to preserve look and feel/user centered design: DRAFT: Damaged originals must be digitized so how to maintain look and feel? How to replicate experience of using original source material? How to emulate user experience? If changes are made, it as close to original as possible let user decide what to do. Processes and workflows: document tools and processes so everyone knows what to do when. Share successful workflows. When to let end user in: Fail often and fail fast. End users can tell you if you are on the right track. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Wrap Up'''<br />
<br />
4:30 - 5:20 - Reconvene in Jefferson. Each discussion has 5 minutes to report out<br />
<br />
5:20 - 5:30 - Closing remarks<br />
<br />
'''Adjourn'''<br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
'''Possible Discussion Topics: ''' Add yours here!<br />
<br />
There were some interesting suggestions left over after the iPres CURATEcamp. See: http://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php/Ideas_for_Future_Curate_Camps<br />
<br />
We also brainstormed some ideas that appear below. What do YOU want to ask/brainstorm about/present/discuss? What is keeping you up at night?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
Details on the CURATEcamp and on how to register for the Archiving 2013 conference and the CURATEcamp are available here: [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
A CURATEcamp brings individuals together<br />
to discuss topics they define. For this<br />
special condensed version, the theme is<br />
Digitized / Born Digital Together. The<br />
theme was selected to take advantage of<br />
Archiving 2013’s rich combination of experts—<br />
those working in imaging and digital<br />
curation within the cultural, academic,<br />
and industry sectors.<br />
<br />
<br />
The “unconference” format of CURATEcamp<br />
encourages attendees to identify and discuss<br />
the issues they care about the most,<br />
leading to progress on solving real problems.<br />
Two key ideas are that participants<br />
define the agenda and that there are no<br />
spectators. Everyone who comes should<br />
plan on actively participating in and helping to lead discussions.<br />
<br />
<br />
Possible topics might include:<br />
<br />
<br />
• Are there necessary differences in<br />
processes for managing born digital<br />
and digitized objects?<br />
<br />
• Does one size fit all, or “I’m ok, you’re<br />
ok” with different traditions, processes,<br />
and systems?<br />
<br />
• Can organizational cultures be formed<br />
around a single comprehensive vision<br />
for how physical, digital, and digitized<br />
materials can all be made accessible to<br />
the public in the most useful way?<br />
<br />
• How can institutions get the most value<br />
from their resources when managing<br />
both types of material?<br />
<br />
• How can we make all our processes<br />
more efficient and scalable?<br />
<br />
• What are possible roles of crowdsourcing<br />
in extending our resources for both<br />
types of material?<br />
<br />
• Could we develop tools for digital curation<br />
and let the crowd do some of the<br />
actual work using those tools?<br />
<br />
<br />
Attendees are encouraged to start thinking<br />
now about topics related to this theme that<br />
they would like to propose for discussion.<br />
The options for rich discussions are endless!<br />
<br />
== Registration Info ==<br />
<br />
Registration will be handled by IS&T so use the registration form available on the Archiving 2013 web page. [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
<br />
Please note: Participation is limited to 75<br />
people; advanced registration is required.<br />
There is no charge for this event if you register along with Archiving 2013<br />
by the early-registration deadline. If you register after March 4, the fee is $35. <br />
<br />
Although the event is open to all, priority is given to those who register for the full conference by March 3 on a first-come first served basis. Those who register only for<br />
CURATECAMP by March 3 will be put on a waiting list until March 4. After March 4, all space is first-come/first-served.<br />
<br />
<br />
There is no onsite registration for this event.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/collaboration&diff=2606IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 2013/collaboration2013-04-04T13:30:54Z<p>Meg Phillips: </p>
<hr />
<div>Session 1 : Crowdsourcing and Collaboration<br />
<br />
<br />
•BitTorrent for replication <br />
<br />
•Many different things that could be shared (work, SW, discovery, access, infrastructure, expertise, development)...<br />
<br />
•Hydra project<br />
<br />
•Tool registry (Illinois, Paul Wheatley/Spruce)<br />
<br />
•MediaInfo - A/V md extraction (Caltura uses it?)<br />
<br />
•Avalon (Ind.) is a Hydra head<br />
<br />
•Denmark - lots of crowd participation (advertised on TV, radio)<br />
<br />
•How to leverage collaboration in a really effective way<br />
<br />
•What you can’t outsource <br />
◦What community am I trying to serve?<br />
◦What does that community need?<br />
<br />
•Lack of collaboration spaces <br />
◦Share procedures, templates, policies<br />
◦Ask questions◦Easy to find what you need when you need it<br />
<br />
•Language is a barrier<br />
<br />
•Within your institution - how your work fits into the larger collaborations <br />
<br />
- Would it be possible to come up with an intellectual framework for collaboration so we can talk more clearly about the options and figure out the areas where different institutions can get the biggest multiplier effects from working with others? For example:<br />
<br />
- shared work: outsource some work to others, including crowdsourcing, using other volunteers, etc: help creating metadata, help creating new tools for you specifically using APIs, etc. Sharing particular kinds of digital preservatione expertise could fit here, too - mentoring and consulting with peers at other institutions, for example<br />
- Shared tools - many institutions using the same tools, develop once, use many times across the community<br />
- Shared infrastructure, for example participation in a LOCKSS network for bitstream preservation<br />
- many institutions actually using the same repository/ digital preservation system. It's a fine line between this and participation in a network, but I think there's a distinction. This last option, where the local institution may be using a system that they aren't running, could be helpful for very small institutions with no local DP expertise or a strong IT infrastructure.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp/collaboration&diff=2599IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp/collaboration2013-04-03T21:02:41Z<p>Meg Phillips: Created page with "This is a summary of the discussion in the Collaboration and Crowdsourcing session."</p>
<hr />
<div>This is a summary of the discussion in the Collaboration and Crowdsourcing session.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User:Abbie_grotke&diff=2574User:Abbie grotke2013-04-02T19:34:28Z<p>Meg Phillips: Creating user page with biography of new user.</p>
<hr />
<div>Library of congress web archiving team lead</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Abbie_grotke&diff=2575User talk:Abbie grotke2013-04-02T19:34:28Z<p>Meg Phillips: Welcome!</p>
<hr />
<div>'''Welcome to ''CURATEcamp''!'''<br />
We hope you will contribute much and well.<br />
You will probably want to read the [[Help:Contents|help pages]].<br />
Again, welcome and have fun! [[User:Meg Phillips|Meg Phillips]] 12:34, 2 April 2013 (PDT)</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User:Kyle_Fenton&diff=2572User:Kyle Fenton2013-04-02T19:34:12Z<p>Meg Phillips: Creating user page with biography of new user.</p>
<hr />
<div>Digitization and Digital Curation Lead at Emory University Libraries</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Kyle_Fenton&diff=2573User talk:Kyle Fenton2013-04-02T19:34:12Z<p>Meg Phillips: Welcome!</p>
<hr />
<div>'''Welcome to ''CURATEcamp''!'''<br />
We hope you will contribute much and well.<br />
You will probably want to read the [[Help:Contents|help pages]].<br />
Again, welcome and have fun! [[User:Meg Phillips|Meg Phillips]] 12:34, 2 April 2013 (PDT)</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User:Jessica_Leah_Scott&diff=2570User:Jessica Leah Scott2013-04-02T19:33:57Z<p>Meg Phillips: Creating user page with biography of new user.</p>
<hr />
<div>Archivist at History Associates Inc.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Jessica_Leah_Scott&diff=2571User talk:Jessica Leah Scott2013-04-02T19:33:57Z<p>Meg Phillips: Welcome!</p>
<hr />
<div>'''Welcome to ''CURATEcamp''!'''<br />
We hope you will contribute much and well.<br />
You will probably want to read the [[Help:Contents|help pages]].<br />
Again, welcome and have fun! [[User:Meg Phillips|Meg Phillips]] 12:33, 2 April 2013 (PDT)</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User:Don_Campbell&diff=2568User:Don Campbell2013-04-02T19:33:39Z<p>Meg Phillips: Creating user page with biography of new user.</p>
<hr />
<div>Digital Initiatives Technical Specialist, Lee Library, Brigham Young University</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Don_Campbell&diff=2569User talk:Don Campbell2013-04-02T19:33:39Z<p>Meg Phillips: Welcome!</p>
<hr />
<div>'''Welcome to ''CURATEcamp''!'''<br />
We hope you will contribute much and well.<br />
You will probably want to read the [[Help:Contents|help pages]].<br />
Again, welcome and have fun! [[User:Meg Phillips|Meg Phillips]] 12:33, 2 April 2013 (PDT)</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User:Michael_horsley&diff=2566User:Michael horsley2013-04-02T19:32:46Z<p>Meg Phillips: Creating user page with biography of new user.</p>
<hr />
<div>Archivist, photographer, raconteur, information democrat, byzantinist</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Michael_horsley&diff=2567User talk:Michael horsley2013-04-02T19:32:46Z<p>Meg Phillips: Welcome!</p>
<hr />
<div>'''Welcome to ''CURATEcamp''!'''<br />
We hope you will contribute much and well.<br />
You will probably want to read the [[Help:Contents|help pages]].<br />
Again, welcome and have fun! [[User:Meg Phillips|Meg Phillips]] 12:32, 2 April 2013 (PDT)</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User:Andrea_Goethals&diff=2564User:Andrea Goethals2013-04-02T19:32:19Z<p>Meg Phillips: Creating user page with biography of new user.</p>
<hr />
<div>I will add a biography later...</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Andrea_Goethals&diff=2565User talk:Andrea Goethals2013-04-02T19:32:19Z<p>Meg Phillips: Welcome!</p>
<hr />
<div>'''Welcome to ''CURATEcamp''!'''<br />
We hope you will contribute much and well.<br />
You will probably want to read the [[Help:Contents|help pages]].<br />
Again, welcome and have fun! [[User:Meg Phillips|Meg Phillips]] 12:32, 2 April 2013 (PDT)</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User:Abbey_Potter&diff=2562User:Abbey Potter2013-04-02T19:32:03Z<p>Meg Phillips: Creating user page with biography of new user.</p>
<hr />
<div>library of congress, NDIIPP, Office of Strategic Initatives</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Abbey_Potter&diff=2563User talk:Abbey Potter2013-04-02T19:32:03Z<p>Meg Phillips: Welcome!</p>
<hr />
<div>'''Welcome to ''CURATEcamp''!'''<br />
We hope you will contribute much and well.<br />
You will probably want to read the [[Help:Contents|help pages]].<br />
Again, welcome and have fun! [[User:Meg Phillips|Meg Phillips]] 12:32, 2 April 2013 (PDT)</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/collaboration&diff=2561IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 2013/collaboration2013-04-02T19:30:57Z<p>Meg Phillips: Created page with "Session 1 : Crowdsourcing and Collaboration"</p>
<hr />
<div>Session 1 : Crowdsourcing and Collaboration</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/schedule&diff=2549IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 2013/schedule2013-04-02T18:08:01Z<p>Meg Phillips: </p>
<hr />
<div>== Archiving 2013 CURATEcamp ==<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Schedule Grid''' <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Session 1'''<br />
<br />
Adams<br />
<br />
Jefferson 1<br />
<br />
Jefferson 2<br />
<br />
Washington<br />
<br />
Madison - Laser scanning / 3D data<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Session 2'''<br />
<br />
Adams<br />
<br />
Jefferson<br />
<br />
Washington<br />
<br />
Madison</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013&diff=2548IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 20132013-04-02T17:17:56Z<p>Meg Phillips: </p>
<hr />
<div>== We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. ==<br />
<br />
When? Tuesday, April 2, 2013<br />
<br />
What time? 1:15 – 5:30 pm<br />
<br />
Where? The National Archives, Washington DC ("Archives I")<br />
<br />
<br />
The theme is "'''Digitized / Born Digital Together'''."<br />
<br />
Megan Phillips, Kate Murray, and Mike Horsley, of NARA will be facilitating, but if others experienced with the format would like to help facilitate, too, please get in touch!<br />
<br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
<br />
'''CURATEcamp Set Up'''<br />
<br />
1:15 - Convene in Jefferson Room: Welcome and logistics<br />
<br />
1:25 - Propose and post discussion ideas on the schedule grid [http://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php/IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/schedule]<br />
<br />
1:45 - Consolidate, rearrange, finalize schedule grid [http://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php/IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/schedule]<br />
<br />
'''Session 1''' <br />
<br />
2:00 - 3:00 - Jefferson, Adams, Madison, and Washington rooms are available for discussions<br />
<br />
'''Break''' <br />
<br />
3:00 - 3:30 - Soft drinks will be available at 3:15<br />
<br />
'''Session 2''' <br />
<br />
3:30 - 4:30 - Jefferson, Adams, Madison, and Washington rooms are available for discussions <br />
<br />
'''Wrap Up'''<br />
<br />
4:30 - 5:20 - Reconvene in Jefferson. Each discussion has 5 minutes to report out<br />
<br />
5:20 - 5:30 - Closing remarks<br />
<br />
'''Adjourn'''<br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
'''Possible Discussion Topics: ''' Add yours here!<br />
<br />
There were some interesting suggestions left over after the iPres CURATEcamp. See: http://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php/Ideas_for_Future_Curate_Camps<br />
<br />
We also brainstormed some ideas that appear below. What do YOU want to ask/brainstorm about/present/discuss? What is keeping you up at night?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
Details on the CURATEcamp and on how to register for the Archiving 2013 conference and the CURATEcamp are available here: [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
A CURATEcamp brings individuals together<br />
to discuss topics they define. For this<br />
special condensed version, the theme is<br />
Digitized / Born Digital Together. The<br />
theme was selected to take advantage of<br />
Archiving 2013’s rich combination of experts—<br />
those working in imaging and digital<br />
curation within the cultural, academic,<br />
and industry sectors.<br />
<br />
<br />
The “unconference” format of CURATEcamp<br />
encourages attendees to identify and discuss<br />
the issues they care about the most,<br />
leading to progress on solving real problems.<br />
Two key ideas are that participants<br />
define the agenda and that there are no<br />
spectators. Everyone who comes should<br />
plan on actively participating in and helping to lead discussions.<br />
<br />
<br />
Possible topics might include:<br />
<br />
<br />
• Are there necessary differences in<br />
processes for managing born digital<br />
and digitized objects?<br />
<br />
• Does one size fit all, or “I’m ok, you’re<br />
ok” with different traditions, processes,<br />
and systems?<br />
<br />
• Can organizational cultures be formed<br />
around a single comprehensive vision<br />
for how physical, digital, and digitized<br />
materials can all be made accessible to<br />
the public in the most useful way?<br />
<br />
• How can institutions get the most value<br />
from their resources when managing<br />
both types of material?<br />
<br />
• How can we make all our processes<br />
more efficient and scalable?<br />
<br />
• What are possible roles of crowdsourcing<br />
in extending our resources for both<br />
types of material?<br />
<br />
• Could we develop tools for digital curation<br />
and let the crowd do some of the<br />
actual work using those tools?<br />
<br />
<br />
Attendees are encouraged to start thinking<br />
now about topics related to this theme that<br />
they would like to propose for discussion.<br />
The options for rich discussions are endless!<br />
<br />
== Registration Info ==<br />
<br />
Registration will be handled by IS&T so use the registration form available on the Archiving 2013 web page. [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
<br />
Please note: Participation is limited to 75<br />
people; advanced registration is required.<br />
There is no charge for this event if you register along with Archiving 2013<br />
by the early-registration deadline. If you register after March 4, the fee is $35. <br />
<br />
Although the event is open to all, priority is given to those who register for the full conference by March 3 on a first-come first served basis. Those who register only for<br />
CURATECAMP by March 3 will be put on a waiting list until March 4. After March 4, all space is first-come/first-served.<br />
<br />
<br />
There is no onsite registration for this event.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013/schedule&diff=2547IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 2013/schedule2013-04-02T17:11:06Z<p>Meg Phillips: Created page with "== Archiving 2013 CURATEcamp == '''Schedule Grid''' '''Session 1''' Adams Jefferson Washington Madison '''Session 2''' Adams Jefferson Washington Madison"</p>
<hr />
<div>== Archiving 2013 CURATEcamp ==<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Schedule Grid''' <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Session 1'''<br />
<br />
Adams<br />
<br />
Jefferson<br />
<br />
Washington<br />
<br />
Madison<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Session 2'''<br />
<br />
Adams<br />
<br />
Jefferson<br />
<br />
Washington<br />
<br />
Madison</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013&diff=2542IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 20132013-04-01T19:54:16Z<p>Meg Phillips: /* Agenda */</p>
<hr />
<div>== We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. ==<br />
<br />
When? Tuesday, April 2, 2013<br />
<br />
What time? 1:15 – 5:30 pm<br />
<br />
Where? The National Archives, Washington DC ("Archives I")<br />
<br />
<br />
The theme is "'''Digitized / Born Digital Together'''."<br />
<br />
Megan Phillips, Kate Murray, and Mike Horsley, of NARA will be facilitating, but if others experienced with the format would like to help facilitate, too, please get in touch!<br />
<br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
<br />
'''CURATEcamp Set Up'''<br />
<br />
1:15 - Convene in Jefferson Room: Welcome and logistics<br />
<br />
1:25 - Propose and post discussion ideas on schedule grid<br />
<br />
1:45 - Consolidate, rearrange, finalize schedule grid<br />
<br />
'''Session 1''' <br />
<br />
2:00 - 3:00 - Jefferson, Adams, Madison, and Washington rooms are available for discussions<br />
<br />
'''Break''' <br />
<br />
3:00 - 3:30 - Soft drinks will be available at 3:15<br />
<br />
'''Session 2''' <br />
<br />
3:30 - 4:30 - Jefferson, Adams, Madison, and Washington rooms are available for discussions <br />
<br />
'''Wrap Up'''<br />
<br />
4:30 - 5:20 - Reconvene in Jefferson. Each discussion has 5 minutes to report out<br />
<br />
5:20 - 5:30 - Closing remarks<br />
<br />
'''Adjourn'''<br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
'''Possible Discussion Topics: ''' Add yours here!<br />
<br />
There were some interesting suggestions left over after the iPres CURATEcamp. See: http://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php/Ideas_for_Future_Curate_Camps<br />
<br />
We also brainstormed some ideas that appear below. What do YOU want to ask/brainstorm about/present/discuss? What is keeping you up at night?<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
Details on the CURATEcamp and on how to register for the Archiving 2013 conference and the CURATEcamp are available here: [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
A CURATEcamp brings individuals together<br />
to discuss topics they define. For this<br />
special condensed version, the theme is<br />
Digitized / Born Digital Together. The<br />
theme was selected to take advantage of<br />
Archiving 2013’s rich combination of experts—<br />
those working in imaging and digital<br />
curation within the cultural, academic,<br />
and industry sectors.<br />
<br />
<br />
The “unconference” format of CURATEcamp<br />
encourages attendees to identify and discuss<br />
the issues they care about the most,<br />
leading to progress on solving real problems.<br />
Two key ideas are that participants<br />
define the agenda and that there are no<br />
spectators. Everyone who comes should<br />
plan on actively participating in and helping to lead discussions.<br />
<br />
<br />
Possible topics might include:<br />
<br />
<br />
• Are there necessary differences in<br />
processes for managing born digital<br />
and digitized objects?<br />
<br />
• Does one size fit all, or “I’m ok, you’re<br />
ok” with different traditions, processes,<br />
and systems?<br />
<br />
• Can organizational cultures be formed<br />
around a single comprehensive vision<br />
for how physical, digital, and digitized<br />
materials can all be made accessible to<br />
the public in the most useful way?<br />
<br />
• How can institutions get the most value<br />
from their resources when managing<br />
both types of material?<br />
<br />
• How can we make all our processes<br />
more efficient and scalable?<br />
<br />
• What are possible roles of crowdsourcing<br />
in extending our resources for both<br />
types of material?<br />
<br />
• Could we develop tools for digital curation<br />
and let the crowd do some of the<br />
actual work using those tools?<br />
<br />
<br />
Attendees are encouraged to start thinking<br />
now about topics related to this theme that<br />
they would like to propose for discussion.<br />
The options for rich discussions are endless!<br />
<br />
== Registration Info ==<br />
<br />
Registration will be handled by IS&T so use the registration form available on the Archiving 2013 web page. [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
<br />
Please note: Participation is limited to 75<br />
people; advanced registration is required.<br />
There is no charge for this event if you register along with Archiving 2013<br />
by the early-registration deadline. If you register after March 4, the fee is $35. <br />
<br />
Although the event is open to all, priority is given to those who register for the full conference by March 3 on a first-come first served basis. Those who register only for<br />
CURATECAMP by March 3 will be put on a waiting list until March 4. After March 4, all space is first-come/first-served.<br />
<br />
<br />
There is no onsite registration for this event.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Meg_Phillips&diff=2539User talk:Meg Phillips2013-04-01T15:14:13Z<p>Meg Phillips: Schedule grid</p>
<hr />
<div>'''Welcome to ''CURATEcamp''!'''<br />
<br />
Archiving 2013 Condensed CURATEcamp <br />
Schedule Grid<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Session 1: 2:00 - 3:00'''<br />
<br />
Washington<br />
<br />
Jefferson<br />
<br />
Adams<br />
<br />
Madison<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
'''Session 2: 3:30 - 4:30'''<br />
<br />
Washington<br />
<br />
Jefferson<br />
<br />
Adams<br />
<br />
Madison</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013&diff=2538IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 20132013-04-01T15:07:58Z<p>Meg Phillips: /* We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. */</p>
<hr />
<div>== We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. ==<br />
<br />
When? Tuesday, April 2, 2013<br />
<br />
What time? 1:15 – 5:30 pm<br />
<br />
Where? The National Archives, Washington DC ("Archives I")<br />
<br />
<br />
The theme is "'''Digitized / Born Digital Together'''."<br />
<br />
Megan Phillips, Kate Murray, and Mike Horsley, of NARA will be facilitating, but if others experienced with the format would like to help facilitate, too, please get in touch!<br />
<br />
<br />
== Agenda ==<br />
<br />
'''CURATEcamp Set Up'''<br />
<br />
1:15 - Convene in Jefferson Room: Welcome and logistics<br />
<br />
1:25 - Propose and post discussion ideas on schedule grid<br />
<br />
1:45 - Consolidate, rearrange, finalize schedule grid<br />
<br />
'''Session 1''' <br />
<br />
2:00 - 3:00 - Jefferson, Adams, Madison, and Washington rooms are available for discussions<br />
<br />
'''Break''' <br />
<br />
3:00 - 3:30 - Soft drinks will be available at 3:15<br />
<br />
'''Session 2''' <br />
<br />
3:30 - 4:30 - Jefferson, Adams, Madison, and Washington rooms are available for discussions <br />
<br />
'''Wrap Up'''<br />
<br />
4:30 - 5:20 - Reconvene in Jefferson. Each discussion has 5 minutes to report out<br />
<br />
5:20 - 5:30 - Closing remarks<br />
<br />
'''Adjourn'''<br />
----<br />
<br />
Details on the CURATEcamp and on how to register for the Archiving 2013 conference and the CURATEcamp are available here: [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
A CURATEcamp brings individuals together<br />
to discuss topics they define. For this<br />
special condensed version, the theme is<br />
Digitized / Born Digital Together. The<br />
theme was selected to take advantage of<br />
Archiving 2013’s rich combination of experts—<br />
those working in imaging and digital<br />
curation within the cultural, academic,<br />
and industry sectors.<br />
<br />
<br />
The “unconference” format of CURATEcamp<br />
encourages attendees to identify and discuss<br />
the issues they care about the most,<br />
leading to progress on solving real problems.<br />
Two key ideas are that participants<br />
define the agenda and that there are no<br />
spectators. Everyone who comes should<br />
plan on actively participating in and helping to lead discussions.<br />
<br />
<br />
Possible topics might include:<br />
<br />
<br />
• Are there necessary differences in<br />
processes for managing born digital<br />
and digitized objects?<br />
<br />
• Does one size fit all, or “I’m ok, you’re<br />
ok” with different traditions, processes,<br />
and systems?<br />
<br />
• Can organizational cultures be formed<br />
around a single comprehensive vision<br />
for how physical, digital, and digitized<br />
materials can all be made accessible to<br />
the public in the most useful way?<br />
<br />
• How can institutions get the most value<br />
from their resources when managing<br />
both types of material?<br />
<br />
• How can we make all our processes<br />
more efficient and scalable?<br />
<br />
• What are possible roles of crowdsourcing<br />
in extending our resources for both<br />
types of material?<br />
<br />
• Could we develop tools for digital curation<br />
and let the crowd do some of the<br />
actual work using those tools?<br />
<br />
<br />
Attendees are encouraged to start thinking<br />
now about topics related to this theme that<br />
they would like to propose for discussion.<br />
The options for rich discussions are endless!<br />
<br />
== Registration Info ==<br />
<br />
Registration will be handled by IS&T so use the registration form available on the Archiving 2013 web page. [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
<br />
Please note: Participation is limited to 75<br />
people; advanced registration is required.<br />
There is no charge for this event if you register along with Archiving 2013<br />
by the early-registration deadline. If you register after March 4, the fee is $35. <br />
<br />
Although the event is open to all, priority is given to those who register for the full conference by March 3 on a first-come first served basis. Those who register only for<br />
CURATECAMP by March 3 will be put on a waiting list until March 4. After March 4, all space is first-come/first-served.<br />
<br />
<br />
There is no onsite registration for this event.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013&diff=2467IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 20132013-02-05T17:21:59Z<p>Meg Phillips: /* We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. */</p>
<hr />
<div>== We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. ==<br />
<br />
When? Tuesday, April 2, 2013<br />
<br />
What time? 1:15 – 5:30 pm<br />
<br />
Where? The National Archives, Washington DC ("Archives I")<br />
<br />
<br />
The theme is "'''Digitized / Born Digital Together'''."<br />
<br />
Megan Phillips, Kate Murray, and Mike Horsley, of NARA will be facilitating, but if others experienced with the format would like to help facilitate, too, please get in touch!<br />
<br />
<br />
Details on the CURATEcamp and on how to register for the Archiving 2013 conference and the CURATEcamp are available here: [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
A CURATEcamp brings individuals together<br />
to discuss topics they define. For this<br />
special condensed version, the theme is<br />
Digitized / Born Digital Together. The<br />
theme was selected to take advantage of<br />
Archiving 2013’s rich combination of experts—<br />
those working in imaging and digital<br />
curation within the cultural, academic,<br />
and industry sectors.<br />
<br />
<br />
The “unconference” format of CURATEcamp<br />
encourages attendees to identify and discuss<br />
the issues they care about the most,<br />
leading to progress on solving real problems.<br />
Two key ideas are that participants<br />
define the agenda and that there are no<br />
spectators. Everyone who comes should<br />
plan on actively participating in and helping to lead discussions.<br />
<br />
<br />
Possible topics might include:<br />
<br />
<br />
• Are there necessary differences in<br />
processes for managing born digital<br />
and digitized objects?<br />
<br />
• Does one size fit all, or “I’m ok, you’re<br />
ok” with different traditions, processes,<br />
and systems?<br />
<br />
• Can organizational cultures be formed<br />
around a single comprehensive vision<br />
for how physical, digital, and digitized<br />
materials can all be made accessible to<br />
the public in the most useful way?<br />
<br />
• How can institutions get the most value<br />
from their resources when managing<br />
both types of material?<br />
<br />
• How can we make all our processes<br />
more efficient and scalable?<br />
<br />
• What are possible roles of crowdsourcing<br />
in extending our resources for both<br />
types of material?<br />
<br />
• Could we develop tools for digital curation<br />
and let the crowd do some of the<br />
actual work using those tools?<br />
<br />
<br />
Attendees are encouraged to start thinking<br />
now about topics related to this theme that<br />
they would like to propose for discussion.<br />
The options for rich discussions are endless!<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
== Registration Info ==<br />
<br />
Registration will be handled by IS&T so use the registration form available on the Archiving 2013 web page. [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
<br />
Please note: Participation is limited to 75<br />
people; advanced registration is required.<br />
There is no charge for this event if you register along with Archiving 2013<br />
by the early-registration deadline. If you register after March 4, the fee is $35. <br />
<br />
Although the event is open to all, priority is given to those who register for the full conference by March 3 on a first-come first served basis. Those who register only for<br />
CURATECAMP by March 3 will be put on a waiting list until March 4. After March 4, all space is first-come/first-served.<br />
<br />
<br />
There is no onsite registration for this event.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013&diff=2466IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 20132013-02-05T17:14:19Z<p>Meg Phillips: /* We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. */</p>
<hr />
<div>== We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. ==<br />
<br />
When? Tuesday, April 2, 2013<br />
<br />
What time? 1:15 – 5:30 pm<br />
<br />
Where? The National Archives, Washington DC ("Archives I")<br />
<br />
<br />
The theme is "'''Digitized / Born Digital Together'''."<br />
<br />
Megan Phillips, Kate Murray, and Mike Horsley, of NARA will be facilitating, but if others experienced with the format would like to help facilitate, too, please get in touch!<br />
<br />
<br />
Details on the CURATEcamp and on how to register for the Archiving 2013 conference and the CURATEcamp are available here: [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
A CURATEcamp brings individuals together<br />
to discuss topics they define. For this<br />
special condensed version, the theme is<br />
Digitized / Born Digital Together. The<br />
theme was selected to take advantage of<br />
Archiving 2013’s rich combination of experts—<br />
those working in imaging and digital<br />
curation within the cultural, academic,<br />
and industry sectors.<br />
<br />
<br />
The “unconference” format of CURATEcamp<br />
encourages attendees to identify and discuss<br />
the issues they care about the most,<br />
leading to progress on solving real problems.<br />
Two key ideas are that participants<br />
define the agenda and that there are no<br />
spectators. Everyone who comes should<br />
plan on actively participating in and helping to lead discussions.<br />
<br />
<br />
Possible topics might include:<br />
<br />
<br />
• Are there necessary differences in<br />
processes for managing born digital<br />
and digitized objects?<br />
<br />
• Does one size fit all, or “I’m ok, you’re<br />
ok” with different traditions, processes,<br />
and systems?<br />
<br />
• Can organizational cultures be formed<br />
around a single comprehensive vision<br />
for how physical, digital, and digitized<br />
materials can all be made accessible to<br />
the public in the most useful way?<br />
<br />
• How can institutions get the most value<br />
from their resources when managing<br />
both types of material?<br />
<br />
• How can we make all our processes<br />
more efficient and scalable?<br />
<br />
• What are possible roles of crowdsourcing<br />
in extending our resources for both<br />
types of material?<br />
<br />
• Could we develop tools for digital curation<br />
and let the crowd do some of the<br />
actual work using those tools?<br />
<br />
<br />
Attendees are encouraged to start thinking<br />
now about topics related to this theme that<br />
they would like to propose for discussion.<br />
The options for rich discussions are endless!<br />
<br />
<br />
Please note: Participation is limited to 75<br />
people; advanced registration is required.<br />
There is no charge for this event if you register along with Archiving 2013<br />
by the early-registration deadline. If you register after March 4, the fee is $35. <br />
<br />
Although the event is open to all, priority is given to those who register for the full conference by March 3 on a first-come first served basis. Those who register only for<br />
CURATECAMP by March 3 will be put on a waiting list until March 4. After March 4, all space is first-come/first-served.<br />
<br />
<br />
There is no onsite registration for this event.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013&diff=2465IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 20132013-02-05T17:12:27Z<p>Meg Phillips: /* We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. */</p>
<hr />
<div>== We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. ==<br />
<br />
When? Tuesday, April 2, 2013<br />
<br />
What time? 1:15 – 5:30 pm<br />
<br />
Where? The National Archives, Washington DC ("Archives I")<br />
<br />
<br />
The theme is "'''Digitized / Born Digital Together'''."<br />
<br />
<br />
Details on the CURATEcamp and on how to register for the Archiving 2013 conference and the CURATEcamp are available here: [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
A CURATEcamp brings individuals together<br />
to discuss topics they define. For this<br />
special condensed version, the theme is<br />
Digitized / Born Digital Together. The<br />
theme was selected to take advantage of<br />
Archiving 2013’s rich combination of experts—<br />
those working in imaging and digital<br />
curation within the cultural, academic,<br />
and industry sectors.<br />
<br />
<br />
The “unconference” format of CURATEcamp<br />
encourages attendees to identify and discuss<br />
the issues they care about the most,<br />
leading to progress on solving real problems.<br />
Two key ideas are that participants<br />
define the agenda and that there are no<br />
spectators. Everyone who comes should<br />
plan on actively participating in and helping to lead discussions.<br />
<br />
<br />
Possible topics might include:<br />
<br />
<br />
• Are there necessary differences in<br />
processes for managing born digital<br />
and digitized objects?<br />
<br />
• Does one size fit all, or “I’m ok, you’re<br />
ok” with different traditions, processes,<br />
and systems?<br />
<br />
• Can organizational cultures be formed<br />
around a single comprehensive vision<br />
for how physical, digital, and digitized<br />
materials can all be made accessible to<br />
the public in the most useful way?<br />
<br />
• How can institutions get the most value<br />
from their resources when managing<br />
both types of material?<br />
<br />
• How can we make all our processes<br />
more efficient and scalable?<br />
<br />
• What are possible roles of crowdsourcing<br />
in extending our resources for both<br />
types of material?<br />
<br />
• Could we develop tools for digital curation<br />
and let the crowd do some of the<br />
actual work using those tools?<br />
<br />
<br />
Attendees are encouraged to start thinking<br />
now about topics related to this theme that<br />
they would like to propose for discussion.<br />
The options for rich discussions are endless!<br />
<br />
<br />
Please note: Participation is limited to 75<br />
people; advanced registration is required.<br />
There is no charge for this event if you register along with Archiving 2013<br />
by the early-registration deadline. If you register after March 4, the fee is $35. <br />
<br />
Although the event is open to all, priority is given to those who register for the full conference by March 3 on a first-come first served basis. Those who register only for<br />
CURATECAMP by March 3 will be put on a waiting list until March 4. After March 4, all space is first-come/first-served.<br />
<br />
<br />
There is no onsite registration for this event.</div>Meg Phillipshttps://wiki.curatecamp.org/index.php?title=IS%26T_Archiving_Conference_CURATEcamp_2013&diff=2464IS&T Archiving Conference CURATEcamp 20132013-02-05T17:06:28Z<p>Meg Phillips: Created page with "== We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. == When? Tuesday, April 2, 2013 What time? 1:15 – 5:30 pm Where? The National Archives, ..."</p>
<hr />
<div>== We are organizing a Condensed CURATEcamp in association with IS&T Archiving 2013. ==<br />
<br />
When? Tuesday, April 2, 2013<br />
<br />
What time? 1:15 – 5:30 pm<br />
<br />
Where? The National Archives, Washington DC ("Archives I")<br />
<br />
<br />
The theme is "'''Digitized / Born Digital Together'''."<br />
<br />
<br />
Details on the CURATEcamp and on how to register for the Archiving 2013 conference are available here: [http://www.imaging.org/ist/Conferences/archiving/index.cfm]<br />
<br />
A CURATEcamp brings individuals together<br />
to discuss topics they define. For this<br />
special condensed version, the theme is<br />
Digitized / Born Digital Together. The<br />
theme was selected to take advantage of<br />
Archiving 2013’s rich combination of experts—<br />
those working in imaging and digital<br />
curation within the cultural, academic,<br />
and industry sectors.<br />
<br />
<br />
The “unconference” format of CURATEcamp<br />
encourages attendees to identify and discuss<br />
the issues they care about the most,<br />
leading to progress on solving real problems.<br />
Two key ideas are that participants<br />
define the agenda and that there are no<br />
spectators. Everyone who comes should<br />
plan on actively participating in and helping to lead discussions.<br />
<br />
<br />
Possible topics might include:<br />
<br />
<br />
• Are there necessary differences in<br />
processes for managing born digital<br />
and digitized objects?<br />
<br />
• Does one size fit all, or “I’m ok, you’re<br />
ok” with different traditions, processes,<br />
and systems?<br />
<br />
• Can organizational cultures be formed<br />
around a single comprehensive vision<br />
for how physical, digital, and digitized<br />
materials can all be made accessible to<br />
the public in the most useful way?<br />
<br />
• How can institutions get the most value<br />
from their resources when managing<br />
both types of material?<br />
<br />
• How can we make all our processes<br />
more efficient and scalable?<br />
<br />
• What are possible roles of crowdsourcing<br />
in extending our resources for both<br />
types of material?<br />
<br />
• Could we develop tools for digital curation<br />
and let the crowd do some of the<br />
actual work using those tools?<br />
<br />
<br />
Attendees are encouraged to start thinking<br />
now about topics related to this theme that<br />
they would like to propose for discussion.<br />
The options for rich discussions are endless!<br />
<br />
<br />
Please note: Participation is limited to 75<br />
people; advanced registration is required.<br />
There is no charge for this event if you register<br />
by the early-registration deadline.<br />
Although the event is open to all, priority<br />
will be given to conference attendees.<br />
There is no onsite registration for this event.</div>Meg Phillips