Difference between revisions of "CURATEcamp DLF 2012 Discussion Ideas"
From CURATEcamp
Robin Dean (talk | contribs) |
Robin Dean (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* UI/UX development and reuse (how to do this, formal roles, community development) - 16 | * UI/UX development and reuse (how to do this, formal roles, community development) - 16 | ||
* Has the digital realm affected our idea of what digital preservation means? selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation - | * Has the digital realm affected our idea of what digital preservation means? selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation - | ||
− | + | are we saving too much? who decides? - 15 | |
− | * | + | * Now that the bits are preserved, how do we preserve behavior/experience - 7 |
* usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators) | * usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators) | ||
* multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.) | * multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.) |
Revision as of 18:36, 3 November 2012
Topics
- linked data (7)
- digital curation
- records management
- metadata & authority control (10)
- long-term preservation of complex objects (16)
- data model from UCSD (17)
- bootstrapping repository services (getting started with minimal resources) - 15
- development trends
- standards
- data management tools & processes
- Cylinders of Excellence: living with multiple systems (interoperability, one system to rule them all?) combatting "one tool" philosophy (three tools: DAMS for simple items, repo for authorial/ETD workflow, GIS data somethingsomethin'), how not to shoehorn everything (platform/layers vs. monolithic) - especially issues with multiple workflows - 18
- expanding the value of library infrastructure/tools (business use, scholarship) - 12
- Contribution/ingest - 20
- Abstraction layer for repositories especially from early and/or bespoke systems - 2
- community development (e.g. Hydra project on top of not Fedora) - 15
- METS development - 1
- UI/UX development and reuse (how to do this, formal roles, community development) - 16
- Has the digital realm affected our idea of what digital preservation means? selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation -
are we saving too much? who decides? - 15
- Now that the bits are preserved, how do we preserve behavior/experience - 7
- usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators)
- multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.)
- community-building: future of CURATEcamp, sustainability
- PREMIS for preservation metadata
- persistent identifiers, e.g., ARKs
- demos: scholarsphere, UCSD DAMS data model, ... ?
- curation & preservation in the wild (sans repo)
- service models for big data ingest: in-house repos and facilitated ingest within disciplinary repos
- project is done. now what?
- funding models for repository/curation services (grants, etc.)
- e-book preservation
Timeline
- 09:00-09:40: Introductions