Difference between revisions of "CURATEcamp DLF 2012 Discussion Ideas"
From CURATEcamp
Robin Dean (talk | contribs) |
Robin Dean (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* long-term preservation of complex objects (16) | * long-term preservation of complex objects (16) | ||
* data model from UCSD (17) | * data model from UCSD (17) | ||
| − | * bootstrapping repository services (getting started with minimal resources) - 15 | + | * bootstrapping repository services (getting started with minimal resources) curation & preservation in the wild (sans repo) - 15 |
* development trends | * development trends | ||
* standards | * standards | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* community development (e.g. Hydra project on top of not Fedora) - 15 | * community development (e.g. Hydra project on top of not Fedora) - 15 | ||
* METS development - 1 | * METS development - 1 | ||
| − | * UI/UX development and reuse (how to do this, formal roles, community development) - 16 | + | * UI/UX development and reuse (how to do this, formal roles, community development)- usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators) - 16 |
* Has the digital realm affected our idea of what digital preservation means? selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation - | * Has the digital realm affected our idea of what digital preservation means? selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation - | ||
are we saving too much? who decides? - 15 | are we saving too much? who decides? - 15 | ||
* Now that the bits are preserved, how do we preserve behavior/experience - 7 | * Now that the bits are preserved, how do we preserve behavior/experience - 7 | ||
| − | + | * multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.) | |
| − | * multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.) | + | * Wrap-up session: community-building: future of CURATEcamp, sustainability - 19 |
| − | * community-building: future of CURATEcamp, sustainability | + | * PREMIS for preservation metadata (user feedback, requests) and changes coming in PREMIS 3 - 4 |
| − | * PREMIS for preservation metadata | + | * persistent identifiers, e.g., ARKs - 8 |
| − | * persistent identifiers, e.g., ARKs | + | * Gather round for demos at 3:30 - 25ish |
| − | * demos: | + | * service models for ingest: internal repos vs external or subject repos - 8 |
| − | + | * project is done, now what? - proving value of investment - ROI ALSO funding models for repository/curation services (grants, etc.)- 18 | |
| − | * service models for | + | * e-book preservation - 4 |
| − | * project is done | ||
| − | |||
| − | * e-book preservation | ||
== Timeline == | == Timeline == | ||
* 09:00-09:40: Introductions | * 09:00-09:40: Introductions | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 3 November 2012
Topics
- linked data (7)
- digital curation
- records management
- metadata & authority control (10)
- long-term preservation of complex objects (16)
- data model from UCSD (17)
- bootstrapping repository services (getting started with minimal resources) curation & preservation in the wild (sans repo) - 15
- development trends
- standards
- data management tools & processes
- Cylinders of Excellence: living with multiple systems (interoperability, one system to rule them all?) combatting "one tool" philosophy (three tools: DAMS for simple items, repo for authorial/ETD workflow, GIS data somethingsomethin'), how not to shoehorn everything (platform/layers vs. monolithic) - especially issues with multiple workflows - 18
- expanding the value of library infrastructure/tools (business use, scholarship) - 12
- Contribution/ingest - 20
- Abstraction layer for repositories especially from early and/or bespoke systems - 2
- community development (e.g. Hydra project on top of not Fedora) - 15
- METS development - 1
- UI/UX development and reuse (how to do this, formal roles, community development)- usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators) - 16
- Has the digital realm affected our idea of what digital preservation means? selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation -
are we saving too much? who decides? - 15
- Now that the bits are preserved, how do we preserve behavior/experience - 7
- multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.)
- Wrap-up session: community-building: future of CURATEcamp, sustainability - 19
- PREMIS for preservation metadata (user feedback, requests) and changes coming in PREMIS 3 - 4
- persistent identifiers, e.g., ARKs - 8
- Gather round for demos at 3:30 - 25ish
- service models for ingest: internal repos vs external or subject repos - 8
- project is done, now what? - proving value of investment - ROI ALSO funding models for repository/curation services (grants, etc.)- 18
- e-book preservation - 4
Timeline
- 09:00-09:40: Introductions
