Difference between revisions of "CURATEcamp DLF 2012 Discussion Ideas"
From CURATEcamp
(→Topics) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators) | * usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators) | ||
* multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.) | * multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.) | ||
| − | * future of CURATEcamp, sustainability | + | * community-building: future of CURATEcamp, sustainability |
== Timeline == | == Timeline == | ||
* 09:00-09:40: Introductions | * 09:00-09:40: Introductions | ||
Revision as of 17:41, 3 November 2012
Topics
- linked data
- digital curation
- e-records
- metadata & authority control
- long-term preservation of heterogeneous content
- (meta)data modeling
- bootstrapping repository services
- development trends
- standards
- data management tools & processes
- seamless interoperability across v. different systems & workflows
- libraries' role in providing infrastructure for non-traditional purposes
- making contribution/ingest "easier" esp. with complex & novel formats
- interoperability (abstraction layers) from early and/or bespoke systems
- hydra project & community development
- METS development
- UI/UX development and reuse
- selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation
- preservation of bits & preservation of behavior/experience
- usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators)
- multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.)
- community-building: future of CURATEcamp, sustainability
Timeline
- 09:00-09:40: Introductions
