Difference between revisions of "CURATEcamp DLF 2012 Discussion Ideas"
From CURATEcamp
Shane Beers (talk | contribs) (→Topics) |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* UI/UX development and reuse | * UI/UX development and reuse | ||
* selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation | * selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation | ||
+ | * How the digital environment has changed the concept of selection for preservation - are we saving too much? | ||
* preservation of bits & preservation of behavior/experience | * preservation of bits & preservation of behavior/experience | ||
* usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators) | * usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators) |
Revision as of 17:46, 3 November 2012
Topics
- linked data
- digital curation
- e-records
- metadata & authority control
- long-term preservation of heterogeneous content
- (meta)data modeling
- bootstrapping repository services
- development trends
- standards
- data management tools & processes
- seamless interoperability across v. different systems & workflows
- libraries' role in providing infrastructure for non-traditional purposes
- making contribution/ingest "easier" esp. with complex & novel formats
- interoperability (abstraction layers) from early and/or bespoke systems
- hydra project & community development
- METS development
- UI/UX development and reuse
- selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation
- How the digital environment has changed the concept of selection for preservation - are we saving too much?
- preservation of bits & preservation of behavior/experience
- usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators)
- multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.)
- community-building: future of CURATEcamp, sustainability
Timeline
- 09:00-09:40: Introductions