Difference between revisions of "CURATEcamp DLF 2012 Discussion Ideas"
From CURATEcamp
Shane Beers (talk | contribs) (→Topics) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* hydra project & community development | * hydra project & community development | ||
* METS development | * METS development | ||
| − | * UI/UX development and reuse | + | * UI/UX development and reuse (how to do this, formal roles) |
* selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation | * selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation | ||
* How the digital environment has changed the concept of selection for preservation - are we saving too much? | * How the digital environment has changed the concept of selection for preservation - are we saving too much? | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.) | * multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.) | ||
* community-building: future of CURATEcamp, sustainability | * community-building: future of CURATEcamp, sustainability | ||
| + | * PREMIS for preservation metadata | ||
| + | * persistent identifiers, e.g., ARKs | ||
| + | * demos: scholarsphere, UCSD DAMS data model, ... ? | ||
| + | * curation & preservation in the wild (sans repo) | ||
== Timeline == | == Timeline == | ||
* 09:00-09:40: Introductions | * 09:00-09:40: Introductions | ||
Revision as of 17:46, 3 November 2012
Topics
- linked data
- digital curation
- e-records
- metadata & authority control
- long-term preservation of heterogeneous content
- (meta)data modeling
- bootstrapping repository services
- development trends
- standards
- data management tools & processes
- seamless interoperability across v. different systems & workflows
- libraries' role in providing infrastructure for non-traditional purposes
- making contribution/ingest "easier" esp. with complex & novel formats
- interoperability (abstraction layers) from early and/or bespoke systems
- hydra project & community development
- METS development
- UI/UX development and reuse (how to do this, formal roles)
- selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation
- How the digital environment has changed the concept of selection for preservation - are we saving too much?
- preservation of bits & preservation of behavior/experience
- usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators)
- multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.)
- community-building: future of CURATEcamp, sustainability
- PREMIS for preservation metadata
- persistent identifiers, e.g., ARKs
- demos: scholarsphere, UCSD DAMS data model, ... ?
- curation & preservation in the wild (sans repo)
Timeline
- 09:00-09:40: Introductions
