CURATEcamp DLF 2012 Discussion Ideas

From CURATEcamp
Revision as of 16:52, 3 November 2012 by Mjgiarlo (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Topics

  • linked data
  • digital curation
  • e-records
  • metadata & authority control
  • long-term preservation of heterogeneous content
  • (meta)data modeling
  • bootstrapping repository services
  • development trends
  • standards
  • data management tools & processes
  • seamless interoperability across v. different systems & workflows
  • libraries' role in providing infrastructure for non-traditional purposes
  • making contribution/ingest "easier" esp. with complex & novel formats
  • interoperability (abstraction layers) from early and/or bespoke systems
  • community development (e.g. Hydra project)
  • Hydra on top of NotFedora
  • METS development
  • UI/UX development and reuse (how to do this, formal roles)
  • selection (e.g. of content types) for digital preservation
  • How the digital environment has changed the concept of selection for preservation - are we saving too much?
  • preservation of bits & preservation of behavior/experience
  • usage of curation tools by users (vs. curators)
  • multi-institutional repositories (UC, CIC, etc.)
  • community-building: future of CURATEcamp, sustainability
  • PREMIS for preservation metadata
  • persistent identifiers, e.g., ARKs
  • demos: scholarsphere, UCSD DAMS data model, ... ?
  • curation & preservation in the wild (sans repo)
  • service models for big data ingest: in-house repos and facilitated ingest within disciplinary repos
  • project is done. now what?
  • funding models for repository/curation services (grants, etc.)
  • e-book preservation
  • combatting "one tool" philosophy (three tools: DAMS for simple items, repo for authorial/ETD workflow, GIS data somethingsomethin'), how not to shoehorn everything (platform/layers vs. monolithic)

Timeline

  • 09:00-09:40: Introductions