|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == Other Stuff ==
| + | Ppl like you get all the brains. I just get to say thanks for he asnewr. |
| − | 40 attendees
| |
| − | | |
| − | Self identification of catalogers and coders at the event: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/oimg?key=0AjnXcM-jo7xBdGlqSlJTQ1lPRFhCeHZ4TjV3VE9PWVE&oid=1&zx=pqz497ajlxs0
| |
| − | | |
| − | == End of the Day Activities ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | * [[DLF 2011 - Blue sky about how our work is changing|Blue sky about how our work is changing]]
| |
| − | * [[DLF 2011 - Wrap up/next steps discussion|Wrap up/next steps discussion]], including how to create community, other action items
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Possible Discussion Topics ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Linked text are topics that were actually discussed.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Tools ===
| |
| − | * Data normalization practices/tools ** (22 votes)
| |
| − | * User friendly tools for resolving IDs to labels (19)
| |
| − | * Drag & drop metadata mapping transform tool (18)
| |
| − | * GUI for creating MARC/RDA records (5)
| |
| − | * Tools for supporting cataloging by non-specialists *** (30)
| |
| − | * Automatic metadata extraction (19)
| |
| − | ** incl spec coll acquisitions
| |
| − | * Tools for navigating hierarchical controlled vocabularies (14)
| |
| − | * [[DLF 2011 - What open source tools need to create/use Linked Data|What open source tools need to create/use Linked Data]] (35)
| |
| − | * Integrating controlled vocabularies into metadata creation tools (23)
| |
| − | * Metadata editing/creation for repository submission, that can handle multiple metadata standards (12)
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Workflow / Working with Data ===
| |
| − | * [[DLF 2011 - Preparing data for the Linked Data environment|Preparing data for Linked Data environment]] ****** (37)
| |
| − | * [[DLF 2011 - Microservices to support cataloging/metadata work|Microservices to support cataloging/metadata work]] * (35)
| |
| − | ** connecting them together
| |
| − | * Infrastructure to mint URIs, share own Linked Data-style authority data (18)
| |
| − | * Dealing with complex metadata standards in an environment with few resources (5)
| |
| − | * (Controlled/metadata) vocabulary management * (20)
| |
| − | * Metadata repurposing, cross system metadata exchange ** (19)
| |
| − | ** including to/from MARC
| |
| − | * Envisioning technical production infrastructure for SemWeb/Linked Data (25)
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Standards / Formats ===
| |
| − | * Metadata for data sets (14)
| |
| − | * Authority control in non-MARC environments (33.5)
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Meta ===
| |
| − | * How do we talk to each other? ****** (30)
| |
| − | ** Writing functional requirements
| |
| − | ** Explaining limits of data
| |
| − | ** Communicating metadata needs
| |
| − | * Maintaining knowledgebases of information that's common among institutions (10)
| |
| − | ** shared authority files etc
| |
| − | * [[DLF 2011 - How to educate oneself to move closer to the middle of the cataloger/coder continuum|How to educate oneself to move closer to the middle of the cataloger/coder continuum]] (30)
| |
| − | ** Place for sharing bits of code/tutorials that can be used by a typical cataloger/metadata specialist ****
| |
| − | * [[DLF 2011 - How to explain to librarians the utility of formal data modeling|How to explain to librarians the utility of formal data modeling]] (33)
| |
| − | * How to plan/execute events like this in the future (including hands-on) (LATER)
| |
| − | * Extending good metadata management practices outside of libraries (15)
| |
| − | * How to make the case for more robust metadata, through examples/the killer app (13)
| |
| − | * What is the future of cataloging? (3)
| |
| − | * RDA as rules vs. RDA as elements, RDA usage in general (6)
| |
| − | * Promoting efficiency in metadata creation (27)
| |
Ppl like you get all the brains. I just get to say thanks for he asnewr.
